A plan for homes in Missoula, and a Maine coon
Remember the pet parade? I forgot a couple. I think it happened when I went on vacation, far away from the Missoula cold.
I was reminded the other day when I saw pictures of Commissioner Michele Landquist and her adorable little lambs in the newspaper. (Stay warm, little guys, so you grow big and we can eat you later! Pooh. I wish every edible animal looked like a warthog.)
Anyhow, I got some great photos from her and also a cat picture from Councilman Jason Wiener, and all those pics went un-posted. But it’s not too late, as you will see.
Wiener is one of the folks working on the plan to address homelessness in Missoula. I’ll call it the plan for homes, and it sounds like it’s more and more important in the eyes of HUD.
HUD isn’t going to be tossing money out blindly, in other words. Folks there want to know it’s actually making a measured difference and communities aren’t frittering it away.
Below is more information from Wiener. First, though, a picture of his Maine coon. If it’s the same one he had in 2007, his name is Itty Bitty Lincoln. If it’s a new cat, I don’t know the name.
Here’s some info on the HEARTH Act and its implications for the current funding that Missoula receives to deal with homeless and precariously housed populations. I have boldfaced some piece of the summary that particularly relate to the components of 10-year plans and how they will be used to allocate funding in the future:
From http://www.endhomelessness.org/files/2098_file_HEARTH_Act_Summary_FINAL_6_8_09.pdf
Incentives, Selection Criteria, and Set Asides
HUD is required to provide incentives for strategies that are proven to reduce homelessness.
These strategies include rapid re-housing programs for homeless families and permanent
supportive housing programs for individuals and families that experience chronic
homelessness. HUD can add additional proven strategies if there is research to support the
strategies and after a period of public comment. A community that has fully implemented a
proven strategy can apply for the incentive and use it for any other eligible activity, including
the prevention and re-housing activities allowed under the new ESG program. The amount and
specific nature of the incentives is not spelled out in the legislation and will be determined by
HUD.
Thirty percent of funding is for new permanent housing for individuals with a disabling
condition or families with an adult member who has a disabling condition. The requirement
does not apply to each individual Continuum, only nationally (for example, some Communities
can use 25 percent if others use 35 percent).
At least 10 percent of funding is for permanent housing activities for homeless families, which
include families with or without a member with a disability. This requirement overlaps with the
30 percent requirement. (For example, 25 percent of funding could be for permanent housing
for individuals with a disability, 5 percent could be for homeless families with an adult member
with a disability, and 5 percent could be for families without a member with a disabling
condition.)
In addition to the incentives described above, HUD will continue to use a pro-rata need formula
and selection criteria to determine funding. Within 2 years, HUD will be required to develop a
pro-rata need by regulation.
The selection criteria include the following factors:
• Performance: The previous performance of the community, including reductions in the
length of time people are homeless, reductions in homelessness recidivism,
thoroughness in reaching homeless people, reductions in the number of homeless
people, increases in jobs and income, and reductions in the number of people who
become homeless. For communities that use funding to serve people who are not
included in HUD’s definition of homelessness but are included in other federal
definitions of homelessness, performance also includes the degree to which those
families and youth avoid homelessness and live independently.
• Plans: The quality and comprehensiveness of a community’s plan to reduce
homelessness, ensure homeless children receive education services, and address the
needs of all subpopulations. Also considered is the extent to which the plan identifies
quantifiable performance measures, timelines, funding sources, and entities responsible
for implementation. For communities that intend to use funding to serve people who are
not included in HUD’s definition of homelessness but are included in other federal
definitions of homelessness, HUD will assess how the plan prevents homelessness and
helps families and youth live independently.
• Methodology: The methodology for prioritizing funding, including whether the process
uses periodically-collected information and analysis, considers the full range of opinions
in the community, is based on objective, publicly-announced criteria, and is open to
proposals from other entities that have not previously been funded.
• Other factors: Leveraging, coordination, and other factors that HUD determines are
important. For communities that plan to use funding to serve people who are not
defined as homeless by HUD but are defined as homeless in other federal statutes,
selection criteria include goals and outcomes for those populations, including the
degree to which the funding will prevent those families and youth from becoming
homeless and the degree to which it helps them achieve independent living.
*********
Jason Wiener, Alderman, Ward One
1238 Jackson St.
Missoula, MT 59802
(406) 542-3232
That’s it for now.
Oh, I forgot one more thing. Wiener is the new council person on TPCC, as you probably figured if you heard Councilwoman Stacy Rye resigned that post to concentrate on her new job as head of WORD. (Correction: I just looked at the council agenda for Monday night and Wiener hasn’t been confirmed by the full council, so his appointment isn’t final yet. I regret all errors but I mostly regret that I’m not in Mexico right now.)
– Keila Szpaller

February 25th, 2011 at 12:11 pm
The $8million on a parking garage built to supply parking for the lawfirms and banks might as easily have been spent not just on housing but on addiction and mental health services. Alderman Wiener picks his aspirant projects very wisely. (I’ve got a gate and a billboard to sell once the six-figure methodology is paid for.) Please get Crandall and Arambula on the phone, STAT!
February 25th, 2011 at 12:49 pm
I think multi-tasking is appropiate considering the downtown folks have asked for more parking AND help with homelessness issues.
February 26th, 2011 at 12:36 am
@daniel geary Is the $8 million parking garage you refer to the one proposed for Front and Pattee Street? Or the one on Main Street? The one on Main Street was closer to $3million–all in: construction, design and issuing costs. +300 spaces and the Parking Commission Offices, scooter storage, maintenance shop, storage, elevator and bike parking.
February 26th, 2011 at 1:56 am
Well Geoff, since the dark, spooky one that was designed to have another level but was mismanaged by Anne Guest so long it can not support another level cost $3 mill….that would, obviously, leave my reference to the “one proposed for Front and Pattee Streets”. Now, since you are the “it” and “in” guy downtown, tell everyone reading this how Crandall & Arambula leveraged their analysis of the need for the new parking garage (that would be the one on Front and Pattee, Geoff) largely, if not entirely, on the employee impact of the First Interstate and Garlington Lohn Robinson white-collar towers. NOT RETAIL SHOPPERS TO THE MOM AND POP STORES STILL SURVIVING. Then don’t challenge me with legistic details until you crack the code of the big picture yourself.
February 26th, 2011 at 2:02 am
with apologies to my many english teachers for “logistics”
February 26th, 2011 at 2:11 am
Ms. Walzer, In my experience, the Downtown definition of “help with homelessness issues” is an ugly euphemism for “How do we keep Bob Snodgrass, Doug Zimmerman and the lady from J. Elaine’s from blaming all their retail problems on some heart-breakingly disadvantaged people?” And, really, what IS “multi-tasking”? My mother could light a cigarette, open a beer and curse how cold the house was in one psychic moment. Does that qualify?
February 27th, 2011 at 12:53 pm
How about a little reporting on Jason Wiener’s public or private sector transportation planning experience that qualifies him for a spot on TPCC? My guess is the write-up could be summarized in a single word. Suggestions: None, zero, zilch, nada…
February 28th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
I don’t know that anyone on the council has experience in transportation planning, but Wiener as Public Works Committee chairman and Councilwoman Lyn Hellegaard as head of MRTMA would seem to be obvious choices as council reps to TPCC. And the majority isn’t likely to select Hellegaard so Wiener likely will be confirmed this evening.
– Keila