Missoula Red Tape

City and County Government

Missoula Red Tape RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

A plan for homes in Missoula, and a Maine coon

Remember the pet parade? I forgot a couple. I think it happened when I went on vacation, far away from the Missoula cold.

I was reminded the other day when I saw pictures of Commissioner Michele Landquist and her adorable little lambs in the newspaper. (Stay warm, little guys, so you grow big and we can eat you later! Pooh. I wish every edible animal looked like a warthog.)

Anyhow, I got some great photos from her and also a cat picture from Councilman Jason Wiener, and all those pics went un-posted. But it’s not too late, as you will see.

Wiener is one of the folks working on the plan to address homelessness in Missoula. I’ll call it the plan for homes, and it sounds like it’s more and more important in the eyes of HUD.

HUD isn’t going to be tossing money out blindly, in other words. Folks there want to know it’s actually making a measured difference and communities aren’t frittering it away.

Below is more information from Wiener. First, though, a picture of his Maine coon. If it’s the same one he had in 2007, his name is Itty Bitty Lincoln. If it’s a new cat, I don’t know the name.

mainecoon

Here’s some info on the HEARTH Act and its implications for the current funding that Missoula receives to deal with homeless and precariously housed populations. I have boldfaced some piece of the summary that particularly relate to the components of 10-year plans and how they will be used to allocate funding in the future:

From http://www.endhomelessness.org/files/2098_file_HEARTH_Act_Summary_FINAL_6_8_09.pdf

Incentives, Selection Criteria, and Set Asides

HUD is required to provide incentives for strategies that are proven to reduce homelessness.

These strategies include rapid re-housing programs for homeless families and permanent

supportive housing programs for individuals and families that experience chronic

homelessness. HUD can add additional proven strategies if there is research to support the

strategies and after a period of public comment. A community that has fully implemented a

proven strategy can apply for the incentive and use it for any other eligible activity, including

the prevention and re-housing activities allowed under the new ESG program. The amount and

specific nature of the incentives is not spelled out in the legislation and will be determined by

HUD.

Thirty percent of funding is for new permanent housing for individuals with a disabling

condition or families with an adult member who has a disabling condition. The requirement

does not apply to each individual Continuum, only nationally (for example, some Communities

can use 25 percent if others use 35 percent).

At least 10 percent of funding is for permanent housing activities for homeless families, which

include families with or without a member with a disability. This requirement overlaps with the

30 percent requirement. (For example, 25 percent of funding could be for permanent housing

for individuals with a disability, 5 percent could be for homeless families with an adult member

with a disability, and 5 percent could be for families without a member with a disabling

condition.)

In addition to the incentives described above, HUD will continue to use a pro-rata need formula

and selection criteria to determine funding. Within 2 years, HUD will be required to develop a

pro-rata need by regulation.

The selection criteria include the following factors:

• Performance: The previous performance of the community, including reductions in the

length of time people are homeless, reductions in homelessness recidivism,

thoroughness in reaching homeless people, reductions in the number of homeless

people, increases in jobs and income, and reductions in the number of people who

become homeless. For communities that use funding to serve people who are not

included in HUD’s definition of homelessness but are included in other federal

definitions of homelessness, performance also includes the degree to which those

families and youth avoid homelessness and live independently.

• Plans: The quality and comprehensiveness of a community’s plan to reduce

homelessness, ensure homeless children receive education services, and address the

needs of all subpopulations. Also considered is the extent to which the plan identifies

quantifiable performance measures, timelines, funding sources, and entities responsible

for implementation. For communities that intend to use funding to serve people who are

not included in HUD’s definition of homelessness but are included in other federal

definitions of homelessness, HUD will assess how the plan prevents homelessness and

helps families and youth live independently.

• Methodology: The methodology for prioritizing funding, including whether the process

uses periodically-collected information and analysis, considers the full range of opinions

in the community, is based on objective, publicly-announced criteria, and is open to

proposals from other entities that have not previously been funded.

• Other factors: Leveraging, coordination, and other factors that HUD determines are

important. For communities that plan to use funding to serve people who are not

defined as homeless by HUD but are defined as homeless in other federal statutes,

selection criteria include goals and outcomes for those populations, including the

degree to which the funding will prevent those families and youth from becoming

homeless and the degree to which it helps them achieve independent living.

*********

Jason Wiener, Alderman, Ward One

1238 Jackson St.

Missoula, MT 59802

(406) 542-3232


That’s it for now.

Oh, I forgot one more thing. Wiener is the new council person on TPCC, as you probably figured if you heard Councilwoman Stacy Rye resigned that post to concentrate on her new job as head of WORD. (Correction: I just looked at the council agenda for Monday night and Wiener hasn’t been confirmed by the full council, so his appointment isn’t final yet. I regret all errors but I mostly regret that I’m not in Mexico right now.)

– Keila Szpaller

8 Responses to “A plan for homes in Missoula, and a Maine coon”

  1. 1
    daniel geary:

    The $8million on a parking garage built to supply parking for the lawfirms and banks might as easily have been spent not just on housing but on addiction and mental health services. Alderman Wiener picks his aspirant projects very wisely. (I’ve got a gate and a billboard to sell once the six-figure methodology is paid for.) Please get Crandall and Arambula on the phone, STAT!

  2. 2
    Pam Walzer:

    I think multi-tasking is appropiate considering the downtown folks have asked for more parking AND help with homelessness issues.

  3. 3
    Geoff Badenoch:

    @daniel geary Is the $8 million parking garage you refer to the one proposed for Front and Pattee Street? Or the one on Main Street? The one on Main Street was closer to $3million–all in: construction, design and issuing costs. +300 spaces and the Parking Commission Offices, scooter storage, maintenance shop, storage, elevator and bike parking.

  4. 4
    daniel geary:

    Well Geoff, since the dark, spooky one that was designed to have another level but was mismanaged by Anne Guest so long it can not support another level cost $3 mill….that would, obviously, leave my reference to the “one proposed for Front and Pattee Streets”. Now, since you are the “it” and “in” guy downtown, tell everyone reading this how Crandall & Arambula leveraged their analysis of the need for the new parking garage (that would be the one on Front and Pattee, Geoff) largely, if not entirely, on the employee impact of the First Interstate and Garlington Lohn Robinson white-collar towers. NOT RETAIL SHOPPERS TO THE MOM AND POP STORES STILL SURVIVING. Then don’t challenge me with legistic details until you crack the code of the big picture yourself.

  5. 5
    daniel geary:

    with apologies to my many english teachers for “logistics”

  6. 6
    daniel geary:

    Ms. Walzer, In my experience, the Downtown definition of “help with homelessness issues” is an ugly euphemism for “How do we keep Bob Snodgrass, Doug Zimmerman and the lady from J. Elaine’s from blaming all their retail problems on some heart-breakingly disadvantaged people?” And, really, what IS “multi-tasking”? My mother could light a cigarette, open a beer and curse how cold the house was in one psychic moment. Does that qualify?

  7. 7
    Adam Hertz:

    How about a little reporting on Jason Wiener’s public or private sector transportation planning experience that qualifies him for a spot on TPCC? My guess is the write-up could be summarized in a single word. Suggestions: None, zero, zilch, nada…

  8. 8
    admin:

    I don’t know that anyone on the council has experience in transportation planning, but Wiener as Public Works Committee chairman and Councilwoman Lyn Hellegaard as head of MRTMA would seem to be obvious choices as council reps to TPCC. And the majority isn’t likely to select Hellegaard so Wiener likely will be confirmed this evening.
    – Keila

Categories

Tags

Archives

Recent Posts